Services

Twelve areas of engineering work

Each service below describes what the work involves, the problems it addresses, where it typically fits, how we run it and what it can realistically produce. Most engagements combine several of them.

  • 01Custom software development
  • 02Web application development
  • 03Mobile application development
  • 04Cloud solutions
  • 05API and systems integration
  • 06UI/UX engineering
  • 07Legacy software modernisation
  • 08Quality assurance and testing
  • 09DevOps and infrastructure
  • 10Technical consulting
  • 11Maintenance and ongoing support
  • 12Cybersecurity-focused engineering
Service 01

Custom software development

Software designed around a specific operational process rather than adapted from a generic product. This is the right route when off-the-shelf tools force a business to change how it works in ways that cost more than they save.

Problems addressed

Processes held together by spreadsheets, email threads and undocumented personal knowledge; tools that cover eighty per cent of a workflow and leave the rest manual.

Suitable use cases

  • Internal operations platforms replacing manual coordination
  • Domain-specific tools with rules no commercial product implements
  • Customer-facing systems that form part of the service itself

Expected process

Discovery of the process and its exceptions, data modelling, an agreed architecture, then iterative delivery with review at the end of each increment and a controlled migration of existing records.

Potential outcomes

A system that reflects how the organisation actually works, with a documented data model and a codebase another team can continue. Results depend on scope, data quality and the availability of domain knowledge.

Service 02

Web application development

Browser-based applications, from internal dashboards to customer portals, built with attention to performance, accessibility and correct behaviour under real network conditions.

Problems addressed

Interfaces that are slow on ordinary hardware, break on smaller screens, lose user input, or are unusable with a keyboard or screen reader.

Suitable use cases

  • Customer portals and self-service areas
  • Back-office and administrative applications
  • Reporting and monitoring interfaces over existing data

Expected process

Interface and data design in parallel, component-level implementation with automated tests, accessibility checks against WCAG guidance, and performance measurement on representative devices before release.

Potential outcomes

A responsive application that behaves predictably across devices and remains straightforward to extend. Measured performance depends on hosting, data volume and integration behaviour.

Service 03

Mobile application development

Applications for phones and tablets, whether native for a single platform or shared across both, designed for intermittent connectivity, limited battery and platform review requirements.

Problems addressed

Field or customer workflows that assume a desktop; applications that fail when the network drops; releases blocked by store policy or platform changes.

Suitable use cases

  • Field data capture with offline operation
  • Customer applications extending an existing web service
  • Internal tools for staff working away from a desk

Expected process

Platform decision based on the required device capabilities, offline and synchronisation design, staged testing on physical devices, then store submission with a release and update plan.

Potential outcomes

An application that behaves correctly with unreliable connectivity and can be updated on a regular cadence. Store approval timelines are controlled by the platform owners, not by us.

Service 04

Cloud solutions

Design and implementation of cloud-hosted environments for workloads that need to run continuously, scale with demand and be recoverable after failure.

Problems addressed

Servers configured by hand and impossible to reproduce; costs that grow without explanation; no tested recovery path when a component fails.

Suitable use cases

  • Migrating an existing application to managed cloud services
  • Building new workloads on containerised infrastructure
  • Introducing environment parity between development and production

Expected process

Assessment of the current workload, target architecture with cost and failure modes described, infrastructure defined as code, staged migration with rollback, then handover documentation.

Potential outcomes

Reproducible environments, clearer cost attribution and a defined recovery procedure. Actual cost and availability depend on provider services and the workload's own characteristics.

Service 05

API and systems integration

Connecting systems so that data moves reliably between them, with explicit rules about which system owns which fields and what happens when a transfer fails.

Problems addressed

The same customer or product record held differently in several systems; overnight file transfers that fail silently; point-to-point connections nobody fully understands.

Suitable use cases

  • Synchronising CRM, billing and fulfilment data
  • Exposing internal capability as a documented API for partners
  • Replacing manual exports and imports with automated transfer

Expected process

Mapping of sources, ownership and transformation rules; contract-first API design; implementation with retries, idempotency and reconciliation; monitoring so failed transfers are visible.

Potential outcomes

Predictable synchronisation with a defined place to investigate discrepancies. Reliability is bounded by the availability and behaviour of the systems being connected.

Service 06

UI/UX engineering

Interface design carried through to implementation as a maintained system of components, so that what is designed is what ships and stays consistent as the product grows.

Problems addressed

Designs that degrade during implementation; visual inconsistency across screens; interfaces that pass a design review but fail with real data volumes or edge cases.

Suitable use cases

  • Establishing a component library and design tokens
  • Redesigning a workflow that users find slow or confusing
  • Bringing accessibility up to a defined standard

Expected process

Review of current usage and pain points, flow and state design including empty, loading and error states, implementation as reusable components, and validation with real content.

Potential outcomes

A consistent interface with documented components and fewer regressions between design and delivery. Improvements in user behaviour depend on the context and cannot be guaranteed in advance.

Service 07

Legacy software modernisation

Gradual improvement of long-lived systems that still deliver value but have become expensive, slow or risky to change — without a disruptive full rewrite.

Problems addressed

Unsupported runtimes and libraries; no automated tests; deployment knowledge held by one person; every release accompanied by unplanned incidents.

Suitable use cases

  • Upgrading a framework or runtime that has reached end of support
  • Extracting a module so it can be developed independently
  • Adding tests and delivery automation to an untested codebase

Expected process

Assessment of the code, dependencies and deployment path; characterisation tests around current behaviour; incremental refactoring behind stable interfaces; measured replacement of components in a prioritised order.

Potential outcomes

Lower change risk, faster onboarding and a supported dependency baseline. Timelines vary widely with the size and condition of the existing system.

Service 08

Quality assurance and testing

A test strategy proportionate to risk: automated where it pays for itself, exploratory where human judgement finds more, and always visible in the delivery pipeline.

Problems addressed

Defects found by users first; regression testing performed manually before every release; test suites so slow or unstable that teams learn to ignore them.

Suitable use cases

  • Building an automated regression suite for a growing product
  • Introducing performance testing before a seasonal peak
  • Adding release verification to an existing pipeline

Expected process

Risk analysis, a layered test plan across unit, integration and end-to-end levels, automation implemented alongside features, and reporting that makes failures actionable rather than noisy.

Potential outcomes

Earlier defect detection and more confident releases. No test strategy eliminates defects entirely; the aim is to find the costly ones before users do.

Service 09

DevOps and infrastructure

The engineering around software delivery: build pipelines, environments, deployment, monitoring and the operational routines that keep systems observable.

Problems addressed

Manual deployments performed out of hours; environments that differ from production; incidents detected by customers; no rollback other than restoring a backup.

Suitable use cases

  • Automating build, test and deployment for an existing application
  • Introducing infrastructure as code and repeatable environments
  • Setting up monitoring, structured logging and alert routing

Expected process

Review of the current path to production, pipeline design with quality gates, infrastructure codified and versioned, observability added, and runbooks written for common operational tasks.

Potential outcomes

Shorter, less stressful releases and faster detection of problems. Availability figures depend on architecture, dependencies and the operating budget.

Service 10

Technical consulting

Independent engineering assessment for organisations making a significant technical decision, without an obligation to hand the implementation to us.

Problems addressed

Uncertainty about build versus buy; a proposed architecture nobody internally can validate; unclear technical risk in a planned programme of work.

Suitable use cases

  • Architecture and code review before committing to a direction
  • Due diligence on a system being acquired or inherited
  • Planning a migration, replatforming or scaling programme

Expected process

Structured review of code, architecture, delivery practice and operational risk, interviews with the people involved, and a written report with findings, options and trade-offs.

Potential outcomes

A clearer basis for a decision, with risks named explicitly. Recommendations describe options and consequences rather than guaranteed commercial results.

Service 11

Maintenance and ongoing support

Continuous care for software already in production: dependency and security updates, defect resolution, monitoring and small planned improvements.

Problems addressed

Applications left untouched until something breaks; accumulated dependency debt that makes the next upgrade a project in itself; no defined route for reporting a fault.

Suitable use cases

  • Ongoing support for a system we built or inherited
  • Scheduled dependency and platform update cycles
  • Correcting defects and making small enhancements over time

Expected process

Handover and documentation of the current state, an agreed response approach for issues, a regular update cadence, and periodic review of technical debt and priorities.

Potential outcomes

Software that stays current, with problems addressed in a planned way rather than as emergencies. Response arrangements are agreed in writing per engagement.

Service 12

Cybersecurity-focused engineering

Security work embedded in development: threat-aware design, secure handling of credentials and personal data, dependency management and hardening review.

Problems addressed

Access rights granted broadly and never revisited; secrets stored in code or configuration files; no visibility of vulnerable third-party components; personal data retained without a defined purpose.

Suitable use cases

  • Security review of an application before a public launch
  • Introducing secret management and least-privilege access
  • Designing data handling around retention and deletion requirements

Expected process

Threat modelling of data flows and trust boundaries, review of authentication, authorisation and storage, dependency scanning in the pipeline, and remediation prioritised by realistic risk.

Potential outcomes

A reduced and better-understood attack surface. Security work lowers risk; it cannot make any system immune, and we do not present it as a guarantee.

Enquiries

To discuss any of these services, write to [email protected] with a description of the situation. We reply in English.